Streaming and ePublishing companies join fight against Google

The companies argue that Google's policy is anti-competitive and violates local law. They also argue that the policy would cause them irreparable harm.

Google's billing policy requires that all apps that sell digital goods or services through the Play Store use Google's in-app billing system. Google takes a commission of 11-26% on all payments made through this system. The companies challenging the policy argue that this commission is too high and that it gives Google an unfair advantage over its competitors.

The case is still ongoing, but it has the potential to have a significant impact on the Indian tech industry. If the court rules in favor of the companies, it could force Google to change its billing policy. This could lead to lower prices for consumers and more competition in the app market.

Here are some of the key arguments that the companies have made against Google's billing policy:

• The policy is anti-competitive. Google is using its market power to force its competitors to pay higher fees.
• The policy violates local law. The Indian government has laws that prohibit companies from discriminating against their competitors.
• The policy would cause irreparable harm to the companies. They would lose customers and revenue if they were forced to use Google's in-app billing system.

Google has defended its billing policy, arguing that it is necessary to protect consumers and ensure the security of the Play Store. The company has also said that it is willing to work with the companies to find a solution that is fair to everyone.

The case is still ongoing, and it is unclear how the court will rule. However, the case has already raised important questions about the power of tech giants and the need for regulation in the app market.

Read other:online-gaming-companies-seek-clarity-from-states-on-new-rules